Game thinking from Adam Clare

Author: Adam ClarePage 122 of 262

An AI That Designs Games

Michael Cook has set out to make an artificial intelligence (AI) that can design games. Why? Because he’s doing for his PhD and it’s an awesome idea is why. He calls the AI Angelina and their first game the two of them have made is available now!

On his project site he say the “aim is to develop an AI system that can intelligently design videogames, as part of an investigation into the ways in which software can design creatively.”

This is really nifty because if it’s possible that level and/or mechanics design can be done by a computer then overall game development can arguably become more accessible. Ultimately, if Cook is successful in his goal then we would be forced to further question what creativity means in a game making context.

Imagine if we have once AI making art assets and another AI using those assets to make a coherent game. I would love to see some bizarre game generate by such a beastly setup.

I hope the AI gets smarter and better at designing as his project continues. Right now there is still a lot of need for human intervention.

Cnet has some more info on the AI design project:

According to Cook, there are a few problems with a computer AI generating video games for a human audience. One is that Angelina can’t understand difficulty levels very easily — which explains why some levels were confusingly difficult. Cook has made user feedback a part of A Puzzling Present’s design, so that human interaction can be taken into account.

He has also built a system called “Mechanic Miner”, which presents Angelina with an impossible level and tasks her with coming up with a new mechanic to make the level passable.

From the best ghost I know.

We Are All Too Human

Human, All Too Human is a good introduction to European existential philosophy made by the BBC in the last millennium. It’s worth watching if you’re curious about existentialism. If you want some other philosophy then check out the 90 minutes series.

Start with Friedrich Nietzsche to get a bit of a grounding then move on to Martin Heidegger to befuddle you then finish off the series withJean-Paul Sartre.

The audio in this first video is pretty bad, but the rest are fine.

Page 122 of 262

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén