Reality is a Game

Game thinking from Adam Clare

Tag: Valve(Page 1 of 3)

Some Notes On Play Testing Games

Once you have finished your game the hard part begins: when strangers play it.

We submitted a new a game to the App Store a few days ago which we are releasing next week. It’s called AstroDoge and we started working on it Feb. 24 and first submitted it March 8 with an anticipated release of early this past week. We decided to push it to next week for two reasons: 1. add some social features and fix bugs 2. the overall user experience (UX). After watching people play the game we realized we needed to spend a ton of time telling people how to play.

Because of play testing we pushed the release date, combine this with the recent announcement of TradeCity’s beta next month I figured it be worth posting about play testing.

Thanks Valve!

Having people play your game is key to figuring out if your game is achieving its goals – no matter what the goals are. It is key to have people who fit within your target audience to play the game.

Choosing your play testers is usually done first by who’s around and this is fine for early stages of game development. This informal testing should be ongoing with the development team all the way to releases. Once the game is far enough along you’ll need to find people who (you think) will actually want to play the game upon release. This may sound obvious but is often forgotten! There’s a reason that this is point number one in this post and in this Gamastura article.

Some questions we always consider when recruiting are:

  • How old is our intended audience?
  • Is the intended audience predominantly male, female, or split?
  • What device or platform is our game targeting? (Don’t recruit players if they’ve never played a game on that platform before).
  • Does your game assume any prior knowledge from the player?

When play testing, what should you do?

You should shut up and let them play.

Seriously, just watch and listen to what player does and says. Valve has a great presentation on how they play test in which they outline that in person they:

  • Passively watch people play
  • Listen for verbal reports from players
  • Ask questions about the play session once it’s done
  • Surveys after the game
  • Record any physiological data they can get their hands on

Computers are great too! Digital games can be recorded so it’s worth:

  • Tracking where & when players die
  • Tracking where & when players stop their play session
  • Basically all the stats you can!

If you’re not Valve, then there are other (and cheaper) ways to understand what you need to fix in your game. Over at Hobby GameDev, there is a great post on how to play test for indies.

Address What You Apologize For

Are there things about the game that you find yourself wanting to apologize for each time you put it in front of a tester?

That’s a form of feedback that they don’t even need to say out loud. You know what to do!

Embed What You Have to Explain

Is there information that you find yourself wanting to point out to testers? That a certain jump can be made, that a certain button activates something, etc?

That information needs to be embedded in the game, at least textually if necessary but ideally in a more visual, natural, or otherwise immediate fashion.

In the end, we decided to delay our game because the core game mechanic turned out to be something most people didn’t understand. We discovered this because we had to actually tell people how to play no matter how we visually conveyed the information.

To throw a wrench in all of this there is an argument to stick to your aesthetic core. Over at Medium, one of the designers has a great (and long) piece on underlining hyperlinks. Eschew all of the above and stick to your artistic gut.

What is a Skybox?

Most video games benefit from having a sky to increase a feeling of immersion and most of those skies are in the form of a box, a skybox. The way the sky looks can greatly alter the feeling of a game from bright and happy to cold and gloomy. Just picture Katamari Damacy with overcast or Dear Esther during golden hour – it would change the feeling of the entire game.

The skybox is essentially anything beyond the immediate environment that the player will see: it can include the horizon, the sky, and even the ground.

Over at GamesRadar they have a very subjective take on what they consider to be the best skyboxes in video games. I just like the fact that skyboxes are being evaluated in this way.

The design of the skybox can literally change the atmosphere of the game. It can quickly establish if the player is on a different planet like in Mass Effect or if magic is twirling in the air.

Most skyboxes are done in 2D, and can be made realitevly easily in your image editing software of choice. Unity3D has a good writeup on how to create a skybox and use it in their engine. It is possible to make 3D skyboxes and Valve has implemented such a feature in their engine, on their developer wiki you can see how they work and how to make a 3D skybox.

Insight into Games and Business from Gabe Newell

Gabe Newell of Valve fame is one wise fellow – particularly when it comes to his day job: making games and running one of the best companies out there. Recently I’ve listened to a few interviews with him about nearly everything.

In a talk he gave to The LBJ School he reveals Valve does not have QA department but they do a ton of play testing. I also love how hat selling in TF2 was happening so quickly that it broke PayPal!

In December he sat down not once but twice (the second time with coworkers) with The Nerdist. Both interviews are worth listening to and can be found here.

The Valve handbook for new employees is referenced a bit in the Nerdist interviews and is worth looking through (PDF).

Here’s what Gabe said at the DCIE Summit:

Must Read: The Verge Interviews Gabe Newell

Valve CEO Gabe Newell was interviewed by The verge and it’s an excellent read. Gabe discuss the Steam Box gaming console/computer that Valve is making (the article has pictures of prototypes) and how they don’t want to replicate what’s already out there.

Controllers have their advantages and their disadvantages it looks like at Valve they have spent a lot of time thinking about how to best use a controller. This is great as they are even thinking of using biometric and gaze tracking to help make games better. They are looking beyond the gimmick:

I think you’ll see controllers coming from us that use a lot of biometric data. Maybe the motion stuff is just failure of imagination on our part, but we’re a lot more excited about biometrics as an input method. Motion just seems to be a way of [thinking] of your body as a set of communication channels. Your hands, and your wrist muscles, and your fingers are actually your highest bandwidth — so to trying to talk to a game with your arms is essentially saying “oh we’re gonna stop using ethernet and go back to 300 baud dial-up.” Maybe there are other ways to think of that. There’s more engagement when you’re using larger skeletal muscles, but whenever we go down [that path] we sort of come away unconvinced. Biometrics on the other hand is essentially adding more communication bandwidth between the game and the person playing it, especially in ways the player isn’t necessarily conscious of. Biometrics gives us more visibility. Also, gaze tracking. we think gaze tracking is gonna turn out to be super important.

He also offers some design decisions about Half-Life and Valve’s overall appoach to making games that are fun to play:

One of the things that started to drive me crazy in video games is that when I walk into a room, I’m covered with the gore and ichor of a thousand creatures that I have slayed, and the monster in there reacts to me exactly the same. So in Half-Life there’s this whole progression depending upon what you do and how scary you are [to enemies]. Eventually they start running away from you, they start talking about you, and that was just another example of having the world respond to you rather than the world kind of being autistic and ignoring everything you’ve done. So then we did Counter-Strike, [and found] the rule we used for Half-Life doesn’t work in a multiplayer game. We got all this weird data, like you put riot shields in and player numbers go up. Then you take riot shields out and player numbers go up. Fuck! It’s supposed to go the opposite [direction], right? So we had to come up with a different way.

You really should read the full interview.

Page 1 of 3

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

%d bloggers like this: